It's been a life saver on loads of troubled mastering projects as well. But, when I need it or want it, I haven't used anything else I like as much or get the same results with. When I don't need to address different freq ranges differently (or as drastically), then I go to the standard L1, 2, or 3. BUT, have your priority settings off, and you're gonna butcher things quick. Waves L2 and 元-LL Ultramaximizers Weiss MM-1 Mastering Maximizer (from Softube) Digital limiters and maximizers are commonly used for modern mastering but there are still hardware-based solutions available if you prefer to master out-of-the-box. I can get really crazy with it, push into it harder than any other limiters I have, and yet stay more dynamic. it's such a powerful plug when you know how to use it as intended. if you don't understand how to properly operate that (in combination with the rest of it) then you're better off using something else cause you can quickly do more harm than good. PRIORITY is very very important, and I think that's what a lot of people miss, or misunderstand. It's great to really get meticulously dialed in to your source. Not a hard plugin to learn, and once you understand it (easy), it's amazing. Other meanings include psychoacoustic enhancers that can do phase shifts, EQ, saturation, but not necessarily increase signal levels (example: BBE Sonic Maximizer). (I AM NOT POINTING FINGERS AT ANYONE HERE OR ADDRESSING ANYONE POSTING!!!) Today's most common meaning is digital brickwall peak limiter with a makeup gain used in mastering (examples: Ozone's Maximizer, Waves L2 Ultramaximizer). I think people that have issues with it often don't fully grasp how it's designed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |